A proposed California bill, SB 1372, is generating heated discussions as it aims to restrict third-party airport security vendors like Clear Secure from utilizing standard security or TSA PreCheck lanes for their expedited services at state airports. If passed, the bill would require these vendors to use their dedicated security lanes or face exclusion from operating in California airports starting in 2025.
The bill, introduced by Sen. Josh Newman, a Democrat representing portions of Los Angeles, Orange, and San Bernardino counties, seeks to address concerns about equitable treatment and streamline airport security procedures. Sen. Newman emphasized the importance of maintaining fairness in airport security lines, denouncing practices that prioritize expedited services for those who can afford premium memberships.
"The least you can expect when you have to go through the security line at the airport is that you don’t suffer the indignity of somebody pushing you out of the way to let the rich person pass you," Newman stated in an interview with Politico.
However, the proposed legislation has faced significant opposition, particularly from major airlines such as Delta, United, Southwest, Alaska, JetBlue, and Hawaiian. Critics argue that implementing SB 1372 would effectively ban Clear from operating in California airports, potentially impacting revenue streams and increasing airfare costs for travelers.
In a letter addressed to the Senate Transportation Committee, airline representatives expressed concerns that the bill would hinder airports' ability to manage security lines effectively, potentially leading to negative travel experiences for passengers.
Despite opposition from airlines, SB 1372 has garnered bipartisan support among lawmakers who advocate for fair and transparent airport security practices. The bill aims to strike a balance between accessibility and efficiency in airport operations, ensuring that all travelers are treated equitably during security screenings.